How to use DFS namespace to resolve my trouble ?


    there no more space in original disk on file server, note: both file server , disks based on vm , shared database . plan add 1 fresh disk resolve problem of insufficient disk space, , wanna know whether dfs able fix following situation or not?

no 1.  keep original folders , documents unchanged, such p:\dept\sales\kevin.xlsx, p:\ mapping driver on client , linked d:\dept\sales on file server. decide use standalone of dfs create 1 connection new disk. client, feel nothing invariable, when uploads , change original data, data should saved in new disk rather old one.

no 2 . keep folder permission unchanged in contrast old folders or files.

is dfs useful make them come true? if not, whether there better method exists.

hi,

from description, setup stand-alone namespace newly created files saved new hard disk (maybe drive e) instead of drive d out of space.

i'm afraid stand-alone namespace not work this. cannot assign 2 folders on same server as same dfs folder targets.

for example, have stand-alone namespace \\server\root\clients. can set 2 folder targets \\servera\foldera + \\serverb\foldera. cannot set folder target \\server\foldera , \\server\folderb.

even set \\servera\foldera + \\serverb\foldera, cannot control users save files serverb nto servera.

actually first thing think resolve extend drive d new disk, have larger volume saving more files.


technet subscriber support in forum |if have feedback on our support, please contact tnmff@microsoft.com.



Windows Server  >  File Services and Storage



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Error: 0x80073701 when trying to add Print Services Role in Windows 2012 Standard

Disconnecting from a Windows Server 2012 R2 file sharing session on a Windows 7,8,10 machine

Event ID 64,77,1008 Certificates Events Windows Server 2008, 2008R2