Alternatives to SBS
since there no more sbs variant of current ms server technology , there thousands of sbs 2003 servers reach eol in 2015 many smbs have alternatives. 1 sbs 2011, still available, not feel comfortable in using technology not represent state of art. have familiar server 2012. 1 possible scenario replacing sbs 2003 setting relatively low cost server 2012 essentials , move exchange services cloud (hosted exchange and/or office 365). there few clients want see data beeing outsourced these days.
think have used "sbs 2012" option: hyper-v core installation 1 vm dc , 1 exchange server. appreciate short advices of have experience that:
1. advisable 2012-novice (with esxi experience) dare hyper-v-core-installation 2 vms or there many caveats?
2. construction stable , reliable sbs 2003 / 2011 was?
lot in advance comment , regards,
stefano
microsoft pushing cloud os vision , office365 , why went way. office365 great product btw ( don't work ms).
with regards questions use server 2012 standard edition , install hyper-v role, on have couple of vm's running on - example dc , exchcange say. 1 2012r2 standard licence give virtualisation rights install 2 vm's on host long host used hyper-v , mother else.
with regards core install, server 2012 gives cool functionality can install , server setup full gui interface, , once done can remove gui , revert core mode server. if need further config, can reinstall gui - its' done role managed through server manager.
no need use esxi when have hyper-v built in.
i've never used sbs 2003 / 2011 - 2012 solid os , platform no need worry there.
regards,
denis cooper
mcitp ea - mct
help keep forums tidy, if has helped please mark answer
linkedin:
Windows Server > Windows Server 2012 General
Comments
Post a Comment