Idea: Storage Spaces Tier & Resiliency Settings


anyone else experimenting storage spaces , find tier should where resiliency setting defined?

it make sense have tier's various resiliency settings.
(write-intensive ssd) - raid 1/10
(write-intensive ssd) - raid 5/6/50/60
(read-ssd) - raid 1/10
(read-ssd) - raid 5/6/50/60
(7k hhd) - raid 1/10
(7k hhd) - raid 5/6/50/60

command might this:
new-storagetier -storagepoolfriendlyname "archive storage pool" -friendlyname "(write-intensive ssd) - raid 5/6/50/60" -mediatype ssd -resiliencysettingname parity -physicaldiskredundancy 2

maybe 1 need include disks in pool use tier similar adding disks storagepool require them subset of disks in pool.

then mix multiple tiers virtual disk achieve various performance requirements or storage reliability/capacity/usage requirements.  if data not used move through various tiers land on slower capacity based tier.

if fill tier 1 space data written hhds raid 1/10 , still better performance standard hhd raid 5 or raid 6 , later data progressed can moved raid 5/6/50/60.

i heard parity not supported tiering when tried via command line there no objection configuration perhaps either old data floating around or gui not offer parity tiering?

just thoughts.



Windows Server  >  File Services and Storage



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Error: 0x80073701 when trying to add Print Services Role in Windows 2012 Standard

Disconnecting from a Windows Server 2012 R2 file sharing session on a Windows 7,8,10 machine

Event ID 64,77,1008 Certificates Events Windows Server 2008, 2008R2